Fear The Blobby American!

I’m not generally a Mark Morford fan, but he did a good column in the Chronicle today about obese America vis a vis his recent vacation to Cabo. Here’s a snippet:

Perhaps this, then, is the new great divide. Forget red state versus blue state. Forget liberal versus conservative, straight versus gay, rich versus poor, mullet versus sideburn, red wine versus white. The new division in America is greater than anything we have seen before: Healthy versus ill. Slim versus fat. Light versus heavy. Clean-running organs and unstrained hearts and the ability to engage with the world around you with something resembling lightness and ease and swift reflexes, versus a sort of indolent awkwardness and dis-ease and pain, an unconscious layering-on of fatty protection against a world gone angry and confusing.

On David Irving’s Trial Outcome

So famous Holocaust denier David Irving has been sentenced to three years in jail in Austria for violating this law:

whoever denies, grossly plays down, approves or tries to excuse the National Socialist genocide or other National Socialist crimes against humanity in a print publication, in broadcast or other media.

Given the recent debate over free speech issues regarding the Danish cartoons, a lot of people are probably going to say that Irving should not be jailed for what he did. I’m not so sure.

I don’t see this so much as a free speech issue as an issue about lying. I don’t think it is unreasonable to say that in countries such as Austria, if you’re going to talk about the historical record of WW2, you have an obligation to do so accurately. Irving is entitled to whatever opinions he wants, but he’s not entitled to his own set of facts, and I think it’s acceptable to call him on that difference.

We send people to jail for perjury, after all. Why is this so different?

Feeling Bad About Feeling Good

Kevin Drum’s translation of the new BushCo health plan proposal:

Current system (for those with insurance): When you get sick you go to the doctor. When your kids get sick, they go to the doctor. You don’t have to quibble over costs or spend time second guessing your doctor over whether a test he recommends is really necessary. As Bush himself says, it seems like a pretty good deal.

Now here’s what Bush is trying to sell: When you get sick, you should spend a lot of time shopping around for doctors to find one you can afford. You should put off tests that he recommends if they’re expensive. You should haggle over the cost of drugs as if you were buying a used car. And when you get home you should worry about whether you made the right decision or not.

Indeed. Of course, if you don’t have health insurance the whole issue is moot, and neither the current system nor the BushCo proposals are good ways of solving that particular problem. But given the existing setup, less worry = better.

‘Grease’ and the Culture Wars

Remember a week or so ago, when I posted a report about a small town where trying to educate kids about opera by way of “Faust” was considered too radical?

Now another town has decided that “Grease” and “The Crucible” are inappropriate (the NY Times notes that they are the second-most frequently performed musical and drama in US schools). And all it took was three letters to the school’s principal to start the censorship ball rolling.

Even better is the chilling effect this will have for upcoming productions and even on the drama teacher’s career:

The teacher and her students are now ruling out future productions they once considered for their entertainment value alone, like “Little Shop of Horrors,” a musical that features a cannibalistic plant, which they had discussed doing next fall.

Torii Davis, a junior, said that in her psychology class earlier that day, most students predicted that “Little Shop of Horrors” would never pass the test.

“Audrey works in a flower shop,” Ms. Davis said. “She has a boyfriend who beats her. That could be controversial.”

Ms. DeVore went down a list of the most commonly performed musicals and dramas on high school stages, and ticked off the potentially offensive aspects. ” ‘Bye Bye Birdie’ has smoking and drinking. ‘Oklahoma,’ there’s a scene where she’s almost raped. ‘Diary of Anne Frank,’ would you take a 6-year-old?” the drama teacher asked.

“How am I supposed to know what’s appropriate when I don’t have any written guidelines, and it seems that what was appropriate yesterday isn’t appropriate today?” Ms. DeVore asked. The teacher said she had been warned that because of the controversy, the school board might not renew her contract for next year.

I wonder what those head-in-the-sand culture bigots would think of “South Pacific” … the guy who sleeps with a Polynesian girl gets killed off, after all … maybe they would consider that appropriate punishment for immoral behavior. The underlying message, that bigotry will lead to unhappiness, might just sail right over their heads though.

ADDENDUM: Something I remembered after I hit the “submit” button — back in the day, quite a few of the music/drama types in my high school class were enamoured of the Stephen Schwartz musical, “Godspell” (which is a muscal adaptation of the Gospel of Matthew). We begged our theater teacher to schedule a production of it. He refused, saying it would be too controversial. And given that the Jewish population of our school was probably better than 50% I suppose he was right. He did not generally shy away from controversial subject matter — one of the productions we did do during my years at school was the Schmidt / Jones piece “Celebration”, which includes a number in which two characters are making love while a third person watches.

Is there a point to my anecdote? Not really, I just thought it was interesting to show how what is and is not ‘appropriate’ for high school students can vary so widely.