My blog has been going for about 6 months now, and I’m still enjoying the process. Keeping a more or less public diary is an interesting challenge. There’s things I’ve been meaning to blog about for months (such as my thoughts on my ipod), and then there’s the things that I feel are too personal to write about in a forum that is, thanks to Google, more or less permanently archived. Then there’s the issue of making time at all to post – with no Net access from work, I can only post at home, and I’m frequently too tired to take the 30-60 minutes it takes me to compose my thoughts, gather references (if necessary) and put together a spell-checked, more or less thoughtful post. And then, there’s the things I know I want to write about, but somehow when I actually sit down to blog, I fin myself posting about a completely different topic.
Today, for example, I’d been meaning to either finish off my review of William Gibson’s “Pattern Recognition” or rant a bit about Nordstrom’s unique egotism when it comes to hiring. But instead, this post is about something else.
I’ve noticed some interesting results from my webstats page. The little review I posted on The Davinci Code – one of the first posts to my blog, in fact – has generated the vast majority of traffic to the site. For example, in the month of February 2003, it generated more than 80% of my overall traffic, which comprises between 40-50 unique visits to the site per day. Not bad for an unadvertised personal blog that scarcely a handful of friends link to.
I’m somewhat amused by this, because IMO the review is not particularly thorough or insightful. But for whatever reason, it’s gotten into the search engines and people are reading it. I’ve considered going back and expanding on it, knowing that it’s getting so much traffic, but have decided to leave it be for now.
Some other phrases that pop up regularly in the Search Strings report: “schroedinger’s cat”, “lagniappes”, and “donald rumsfeld vietnam”. Most depressing search string: “jews are bad” – although the silver lining is that if someone is really looking for proof that jews are bad, my site isn’t going to help them. And most offbeat: “are there trees that don’t change colors” – now how did that string get someone to my blog?
I’d post a link to the webstats page itself but I ‘d need to change the robots.txt file first, to make sure the search engines don’t go nuts on all the links within the stats pages. And I have to get ready for work now – my blogging time for the day is done.