History Is On Our Side

As I puttered around on the Internet this afternoon I had iTunes going, with the full MP3 collection in rotation. All of a sudden something jumped out at me:

John Dickinson: … Be careful, sir. History will brand him [John Adams] and his followers as traitors!

John Hancock: Traitors to what, Mr. Dickinson — the British Crown, or the British half-crown? Fortunately there are not enough men of property in America to dictate policy.

Dickinson: Perhaps not, but don’t forget that most men with nothing would rather protect the possibility of becoming rich than face the reality of being poor. And that is why they will follow us …

Chorus of Conservatives:
… to the right
ever to the right
Never to the left
Forever to the right.

“Cool Cool Considerate Men” is a song I’ve heard many times in the almost 30 years since I first saw 1776 but hearing it today gave me goosebumps and made me realize something.

This isn’t a new battle we fight in America today. Some of the terms of engagement have changed, but it’s been going on some 230 years already, and I suspect it will continue long after today’s actors have exited the stage and themselves entered history.

That’s the frustrating part. Nobody wants to think that they won’t get to see the fruit of their labors. Even Moses complained when G-d told him that he would not be allowed to enter the Promised Land. Especially today, when so much has speeded up, we expect that we’ll get everything faster than we have before, including social change. It took roughly 100 years to go from the Declaration of Independence to the Emancipation Proclamation, and then another 100 years to get to the Civil Rights Act. And we can see how far we still have to go on issues of racial equality.

But if you think about it, although the pace of change has been painfully slow, over the long haul movement has definitely been in our favor. Things may look dark now, but history is on our side. The regressive set that wants nothing more than to preserve their own property and a way of life that only existed in their minds will not win. It’s just a matter of time.

In other words, all this is not to say that we shouldn’t keep fighting for the things we care about. We just need to keep in mind that this is a long struggle we’re engaged in. We owe it to those who’ve come before, as well as those who will follow us, to play our part. If history is any guide, we’re not going to get everything we want in our own lifetimes. This is real life, not a stage play where everything gets neatly resolved inside of three hours.But over the long haul, change will come.

History is on our side.

And while I have my copy of 1776 out, I thought I’d share a favorite funny bit as well:

Stephen Hopkins: Ben, I want y’to see some cards I’ve gone ‘n had printed up that ought t’save everybody here a whole lot of time ‘n effort, considering the epidemic of bad disposition that’s been going around lately. [He reads:] “Dear Sir: You are without any doubt a rogue, a rascal, a villain, a thief, a scoundrel, and a mean, dirty, stinking, sniveling, sneaking, pimping, pocket-picking, thrice double-damned, no good son-of-a-bitch” — and y’sign y’r name. What do you think?

Ben Franklin: Stephen, I’ll take a dozen right now!

Me too.

Good One

Via Orcinus:

Quote of the day:

“Senator, when you took your oath of office, you placed your hand on the Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution. You didn’t place your hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible.”

Jamie Raskin, March 1, 2006, in Maryland Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee testimony responding to Republican Sen. Nancy Jacobs’ suggestion that discriminating against gays and lesbians regarding marriage is required by “God’s Law.”

Markos on Olbermann

Scott and I caught Markos’ appearance on Olbermann tonight. All in all, he did a good job. However:

1) Damn, dude, SHAVE before you go to the studio. Either that or let them put some more makeup on. Your 5:00 shadow was really obvious.

2) A cotton sweater over a t-shirt is too dressed down for MSNBC.

It’s not just what you say and how you say it. It’s also how you look. Image counts. Daily Kos has already been painted as the home of scruffy liberal elites. The least you can do is not look the part.

I Heart George Clooney

We need more George Clooneys in the world. Cute, smart, and not afraid to call bullshit:

This is an incredibly polarized time (wonder how that happened?). But I find that, more and more, people are trying to find things we can agree on. And, for me, one of the things we absolutely need to agree on is the idea that we’re all allowed to question authority. We have to agree that it’s not unpatriotic to hold our leaders accountable and to speak out.

That’s one of the things that drew me to making a film about Murrow. When you hear Murrow say, “We mustn’t confuse dissent with disloyalty” and “We can’t defend freedom at home by deserting it at home,” it’s like he’s commenting on today’s headlines.

The fear of been criticized can be paralyzing. Just look at the way so many Democrats caved in the run up to the war. In 2003, a lot of us were saying, where is the link between Saddam and bin Laden? What does Iraq have to do with 9/11? We knew it was bullshit. Which is why it drives me crazy to hear all these Democrats saying, “We were misled.” It makes me want to shout, “Fuck you, you weren’t misled. You were afraid of being called unpatriotic.”

The Politics of Censuring Bush

Usually, the bloviating on Sunday morning talk shows is uninspiring enough that sleeping in seems the better option. Today was one of the days when I woke up and found I should have gotten up early after all. Senator Russ Feingold announced on George Stephanopolis’ show that he will be introducing a resolution to censure President Bush.

Although a censure of Bush would definitely gladden my heart, I found myself wondering more about the timing than anything else. Why now? Is it just to put an issue on the table for the fall elections, or is this part of a plan to raise his profile for 2008? Or is something else going on?

It might also be that the nose counts have been done behind the scenes and the Democrats have determined that they might actually be able to push through a censure whereas impeachment doesn’t even remotely have a chance.

Blood In The Water

Scott and I were chatting tonight, and he must have noticed the distinct lack of happiness in my voice, because he asked me what was wrong.

This“, I said.

“I can’t believe we have to do this all over again. It’s one thing to fight for rights you don’t already have, but I hate it that now we have to go out and fight for rights we’ve already got,” I said.

“They don’t consider it over until they’ve won, honey,” he said. “They started fighting with Roe and they’ve kept on fighting, and they’re going to keep it up until they’ve gotten rid of Roe.”

“Yeah,” I sighed. “You’re right. But I still hate it.”

Digby is of a similar mind.

They really mean it. This is no bullshit. There is no downside to overturning Roe for them — and if there is, they don’t care. If they want to overturn Griswald, they’ll do that too. They fought the gun control fight when people were freaking out over crime in the streets and political assassinations. Conservative absolutists don’t give up just because liberals get up-in-arms.

[snip]

But more than anything else we must accept the fact that these people are serious. They want to outlaw abortion and they want to curtail people’s access to birth control. They aren’t lying. And as they’ve shown with gun rights, they are in it for the long haul. We must be just a stubborn as they are and seek to wear them down rather than let them wear us down.

Digby and Scott are right. We need to fight. The Right is smelling blood in the water on all aspects of women’s reproductive self-determination, and they think they are closing in for the kill. We cannot let that happen.

Still, I want to note how much it completely sucks that we have to go back and fight this battle All. Over. Again.

Once should have been enough.