Whither the Treo?

Russell Beattie has some interesting thoughts about the Treo, and by extension, the PalmOS world. His point that although Silicon Valley loves the Treo, it’s statistically nonexistant in the greater universe of portable devices.

It was empirically obvious, most of the people in the room had a Treo, so it must be a really popular platform, right? Wrong. If you’ve got a Treo you might be a cutting edge technologist, but you’re in the backwater of mobility. Trust me. (Actually, don’t trust me, just look at the frigin’ numbers.)

Now, I will admit that here in the U.S. Palm is doing better that its competitors. The numbers I’ve seen show that Palm phones actually outnumber both Symbian and Windows Mobile phones here by a double. But honestly, out of 170 million American subscribers, the total smart phone numbers are still ridiculously low, so I wouldn’t pay much attention to this. The fact is that Palm is a niche player in a niche market (there are more cell phone subscribers in China – 300m – than there are *people* in the U.S.) as time goes by they will increasingly become less relevant as a platform, not the opposite.

I think he’s being a bit too harsh about the potential future of PalmOS and the Treo, but he’s not completely wrong either. Given how much PalmSource is struggling to maintain any kind of relevence in the US consumer market, given the declining number of big-name licencees and the declining number of PalmOS devices available in the market, there’s signifcant reason to worry about the future if you’re a PalmOS aficionado.

And yet — people are passionate about their Treos for a reason. They’re great devices. My Treo 180 died over a year ago and I still miss it. If I could afford a Treo 600, I’d have one. The power of a small, yet dedicated market — especially when key sections of that market are VCs and other players — should not be ignored.

I haven’t linked to Digby for a while

Time to remedy that. I’m swamped with classwork & haven’t time for anything original right now. And Digby, as usual, hits the nail on the head. The day Ann Coulter makes the cover of Time magazine as anything other than an object of derision, is a day to worry.

Ann Coulter is not, as Howie Kurtz asserts today, the equivalent of Michael Moore. Michael Moore is is not advocating the murder of conservatives. He just isn’t. For instance, he doesn’t say that Eric Rudolph should be killed so that other conservatives will learn that they can be killed too. He doesn’t say that he wishes that Tim McVeigh had blown up the Washington Times Bldg. He doesn’t say that conservatives routinely commit the capital offense of treason. He certainly doesn’t put up pictures of the fucking snoopy dance because one of his political opponents was killed. He doesn’t, in other words, issue calls for violence and repression against his political enemies. That is what Ann Coulter does, in the most coarse, vulgar, reprehensible way possible.

Moore says conservatives are liars and they are corrupt and they are wrong. But he is not saying that they should die. There is a distinction. And it’s a distinction that Time magazine and Howard Kurtz apparently cannot see.

Why I Won’t Be Going To BlogHer

A number of female bloggers have rolled up their sleeves, dug in, and done the hard work necessary to get a conference off the ground. BlogHer will be held in nearby Santa Clara in late July of this year. Kudos to them for doing the work, but I won’t be there.

It’s a curious place to be for someone who considers herself a feminist. Part of me feels that I ought to go to show support for fellow women bloggers, but I can’t summon any enthusiasm at all for the event. Perhaps it is because after having spent the better part of a decade working in the technology world, the concept of “wow, let’s have an event where all the techie women can get together” has lost its freshness for me.

But even more than that, I think it is because I resist being labeled as a “woman blogger”. I am a woman, and I have a blog. But Fiat Lux is not a “woman’s blog” any more than it is a “Jewish blog” or even a “political blog”. It’s just MY blog.

I write about some women’s issues, and some Jewish issues, and some political issues, because all of those things interest me. But I strongly resent being pigeon-holed into a specific category of blog based on my gender, religion, or choice of subject matter. Above all else, this is a personal blog. As Walt Whitman said,

Do I contradict myself?
Very well then. I contradict myself.
I am large. I contain multitudes.

Still, I wish the BlogHer women good luck.

Bwahahaha!

James Wolcott is hilarious today. Here’s an except, but go read the whole thing, especially if you’re in the mood for a good snarky laugh to help cheer you up after filing your taxes:

Limbaugh seemed to be implying at the top of his voice that blowjobs are an integral part of the liberal agenda, an argument which he may want to rethink. The popularity of blowjobs is difficult to metric but undeniable; they cause little harm and zero unwanted pregnancies. If the plentitude of blowjobs is part of the Clinton legacy, millions owe the former president a debt of gratitude and an annual pilgrimage to the Clinton Memorial Library in Arkansas.

Yet, like so many products and pleasures, blowjobs aren’t evenly distributed in society. It’s a renewable natural resource not everyone gets to enjoy, and I was struck by the vehement tone of Limbaugh’s tirade. He sounded bitter. I’ve seen this rancor inflict so many middle-aged men. Reading about all the oral sex young people are presumably having, they feel envious and resentful.

Friday Cat Blogging

I’ve had a ton of work for school this week, hence the light posting, but at least Tasha is doing much better. To celebrate, here’s a favorite photo of her:

She’s the least evil cat you can think of, but this photo (taken while she was yawning) make her look like Evil Incarante. Or something.