This Can't Be For Real, Can It?

Apparently, funky news website Fark is applying for a trademark on the acronym “NSFW” (Not Safe For Work). Yes, really.

As TechCrunch pointed out, their chances of getting approved are low, so perhaps it’s all a joke. Filing a trademark application through an attorney (as Fark seems to have done) is relatively inexpensive, so maybe they figured “what the hell”. Seems like a funny way to spend your money, but they’re certainly entitled to do so.

But really, what’s the point? Assuming for the moment that they’re not joking about the application, what’s the next stage? If you get a trademark, you need to defend it. Are they seriously going to start suing every website that uses NSFW in a warning next to a link?

"Sesame Street" Not Safe For Kids?

As reported the the NY Times today, two volumes of old “Sesame Street” episodes recently released on DVD come with the following helpful warning label: “These early ‘Sesame Street’ episodes are intended for grown-ups, and may not suit the needs of today’s preschool child.”

WTF?

There are definitely old cartoons that I would not show to kids today. Some of the early Warner Brothers cartoons, for example, come off as highly racist to today’s eyes. But early-1970’s Sesame Street? How could they possibly offend current sensibilities?

Well, first off, there’s the Cookie Monster. An unrepentant cookie addict:

he can be seen in the old-school episodes in his former inglorious incarnation: a blue, googly-eyed cookievore with a signature gobble (“om nom nom nom”).

And then there’s Oscar the Grouch, who can’t seem to see the bright side of anything:

On the first episode, Oscar seems irredeemably miserable — hypersensitive, sarcastic, misanthropic.

And worst of all, the setting: a somewhat run-down city street:

The masonry on the dingy brownstone at 123 Sesame Street, where the closeted Ernie and Bert shared a dismal basement apartment, was deteriorating.

[snip]

People on “Sesame Street” had limited possibilities and fixed identities, and (the best part) you weren’t expected to change much. The harshness of existence was a given, and no one was proposing that numbers and letters would lead you “out” of your inner city to Elysian suburbs. Instead, “Sesame Street” suggested that learning might merely make our days more bearable, more interesting, funnier. It encouraged us, above all, to be nice to our neighbors and to cultivate the safer pleasures that take the edge off — taking baths, eating cookies, reading.

Nope, definitely can’t have kids seeing that.

Why "The Valley" Should Like Obama

Barack Obama is getting support for a lot of reasons, but his new set of proposals for integrating technology into government is another good reason for folks in this neck of the woods to pay attention to his candidacy.

VentureBeat has a rundown on Obama’s “technology platform”. Here’s a few takeaways:

  • Obama wants to open more of the governmental process. For example, the public should able to comment on the White House website before legislation is signed.
  • He calls more aggressive government support of broadband access.
  • He supports network neutrality.
  • He want to open the wireless spectrum so that winners of the 700 MHz band auction don’t just camp the spectrum in a bid to lock out competition.

Slightly less praiseworthy is his proposal to raise sanctions against companies offering “indecent” content. Fining networks $250,000 for dropping an f-bomb on TV is not going to make a more child-friendly society. Still, on balance, it’s a solid plan.

On the Writer's Guild Strike

Seven and a half cents
Doesn’t mean a hell of a lot.
Seven and a half cents
Doesn’t buy a thing.
But give it to me every hour,
Forty hours every week,
And that’s enough for me to be
Living like a king.

The Pajama Game

Well, the issue today is 4 cents versus 8 cents, but the lyrics are close enough.

I’ll miss The Daily Show, but good luck to the Writer’s Guild.