Holiday Weekend Amusement for Savoyards

I’ve been saving this link for an appropriate time, and the holiday weekend seems as good as any. Besides, I’m feeling a little nostalgic for my long-ago days on the stage.

The Gilbert & Sullivan Quiz

Actually it is multiple quizzes, although you don’t have to take all of them. If you’re a little unsure as to whether you ought to click through the link, here’s a pre-quiz:

1) Have you seen “Topsy Turvy”?
2) Do you know who ‘The Slave of Duty’ was?
3) Do you know what a ‘Savoyard’ is?

If you answered no to all three, don’t bother clicking through. If you answered no to one or two, you might try clicking through for the heck of it. If you rolled your eyes at how insanely easy my questions were, you’ve probably clicked through to the quiz already, but if you haven’t, go, have fun.

Lestat The Musical

Thanks to the kindness of some friends, Scott and I were able to see the new musical “Lestat” in San Francisco last night.

Overall, I’d give it three out of five stars. The show has a lot going for it, it was entertaining, and the majority of the flaws are fixable ones. Whether it will ever make it to 5 stars, though, I’m not sure.

First, some technical observations. The show is done with relatively minimal set; heavy use is made of projections onto various screens. It worked better for the Paris scenes than the other locations, but overall I was OK with it. Using projections on the screen as special effects when the vampires attacked was a nice touch; and I also liked that there were no fangs and minimal blood effects. Costumes were overall good, although Gabrielle’s last costume was just weird, and I’m not sure why they chose to do the ensemble in black and white for “Welcome to the New World”. It didn’t fit. Lestat’s costumes also could use a bit of help — he seemed underdressed much of the time compared to the rest of the cast.

With one exception, the cast was very solid. I particularly liked Lestat and Gabrielle – both had powerful voices and did a good job with their roles. The actress who played Claudia was also very good – her number, “I Want More” was a highlight of Act 2 – but she was also obviously not 10 years old, and that bugged me a bit. Armand, Louis and Marius were also effective. However, the actor who played Nicolas was clearly not as good as the rest of the cast. His acting was weak and so was his voice. To be fair, Nicolas is a tough role – playing a depressed person isn’t easy – but that doesn’t excuse the vocal weakness. Perhaps he was having an off-night, but if that’s as good as he gets, I hope they recast the role for Broadway.

Before I go into the book, lyrics, and music, I want to talk about the big problem with the show, because it impacts all the rest and I’m not sure they’re going to be able to sucessfully resolve it. That’s the fact that they’re trying to cram a tremendous amount of plot — two 300+ page books — into one three-hour event. The problem is, the plot has been cut down to the barest bones of Lestat’s life story, and I’m not sure what else they could possibly cut without either ending the story sooner or deviating away from Anne Rice’s story. And yet, there’s just too much plot.

This impacts everything else. The evening felt rushed, like we were on a whirlwind tour and never had time to sit back and really enjoy the moment. The need to drive the plot forward hurt both the book and the lyrics (the latter moreso than the former; although Taupin’s inexperience with the genre probably didn’t help). The music was fine but could have been stronger in Act 1. All of the really memorable music comes from Act 2 — I particularly liked “Welcome to the New World” and “Sail Me Away” (sure to be the single off the cast album when the time comes) — but other numbers might have been better if they weren’t so focused on driving plot, plot, and more plot.

The other problem caused by the deathmarch through all this plot is that there’s a minimal focus on the emotional attachments between many of the key characters. There may be more purpose here than just driving plot, though. Readers of Rice’s vampire novels are well aware of the significnat amount of homoerotic subtext in these books. I don’t know if a conscious choice was made to de-emphasize that aspect of the story, or not, but this aspect of Lestat’s life is virtually invisible. This missing part of the story becomes even more obvious when you see that the relationship between Gabrielle and Lestat is well laid out and their bond discussed in several different scenes, but virtually no time at all is given to Lestat’s bond with Louis. One minute they meet, the next, they’re living together and Louis is unhappy. Later, when Lestat talks about how happy he was in New Orleans, it’s hard to see why unless you have your memory of reading the books to fall back on.

“Lestat” is only in the first week of previews, and is still being worked on. Much may change before its San Francisco run ends. At this point, I’m reasonably sure the show will make it to Broadway, but I also don’t see any Tony Awards in its future.

UPDATE 12/30: I’m noticing an uptick in traffic to this page. Please be aware that the show has gone through some changes since I saw it and that my comments may not be a valid criticism of the show as it currently stands. Also, I’d love to hear some feedback from other folks who’ve seen “Lestat”.

Friday iPod Blogging

Looking at this assortment, I’m tempted to call it the “WTF Edition”. What a mess. That’s what you get when you randomize the entire list though.

Iko Iko – Cyndi Lauper
Wide Open Spaces – Dixie Chicks
Windswept – Bryan Ferry
Carolina On My Mind – James Taylor
Don’t Stand So Close To Me ’86 – The Police
Shape of My Heart – Backstreet Boys
South Ferry Road – The Hooters
Baby Grand – Billy Joel
A Dream Is A Wish Your Heart Makes – Cinderella
God Save the Queen – The Sex Pistols

No new cat pix today, sorry to say.

“I’ve Read Your Blog”

I finally got a good night’s sleep and am feeing a bit better today, but still not feeling very bloggy.

Part of this, I know, is directly related to the fact that I had a job interview Tuesday and almost the first thing out of the hiring manager’s mouth as the interview started was, “I’ve read your blog”.

That was the first time I’d encountered that phrase in an interview. It seems to me that when someone starts an interview off like that, the person in question probably has some ideas already set about you, and that has the potential to be either very good or very bad. Luckily for me, it was good, and I have already accepted a verbal job offer from the company (hard copy is being FedExed). It’s only an internship, but it’s also the first non-survival job I’ve gotten since 2002, and I’m very pleased about the whole thing.

It’s also making me think really hard about this blog and what I can “safely” say here.

Despite the economic recovery of the last several years, this is still a tight job market, and doubly so for people like me who are, in essence, re-entering the workforce. I worry that personal details could be used against me in hiring decisions. A casual Google search on my name will bring this blog up in short order. I have to assume that anything I say here will be read, and potentially used in a hiring decision.

I don’t really care if an employer knows what my politics are. If someone felt so strongly about my opinions on world events that they felt they couldn’t hire me, well, I probably wouldn’t have been happy working for that person anyway. I’m concerned about the personal stuff though. And thus we go full-circle to this week.

As mentioned, I’ve not been feeling very well this week. But if I start to blog about why, I find myself thinking, is this something I really want an employer to know? It’s none of their business. And so the blog post doesn’t get written.

Feeling that I have to self-censor in order to be employable is no fun. Now, maybe I’m being paranoid. After all, I got the job. But that’s how I’m feeling.

And yes, I know there’s a ton of other stuff I could be blogging about right now. Sorry, but I’m not feeling very inspired. Cruise my blogroll; the usual suspects are all kicking ass and taking names. If past history is a guide, I should be feeling more bloggy in a day or two.

Enemies Foreign and Domestic

I am no fan of PETA and their “everyone should be a vegan but having an 80% kill rate at our animal shelter is just fine” hypocricy. However, even I have to wonder how the war on terrorism is served by this (emphasis added):

After the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, John Ashcroft, who was then attorney general, loosened restrictions on the F.B.I.’s investigative powers, giving the bureau greater ability to visit and monitor Web sites, mosques and other public entities in developing terrorism leads. The bureau has used that authority to investigate not only groups with suspected ties to foreign terrorists, but also protest groups suspected of having links to violent or disruptive activities.

But the documents, coming after the Bush administration’s confirmation that President Bush had authorized some spying without warrants in fighting terrorism, prompted charges from civil rights advocates that the government had improperly blurred the line between terrorism and acts of civil disobedience and lawful protest.

One F.B.I. document indicates that agents in Indianapolis planned to conduct surveillance as part of a “Vegan Community Project.” Another document talks of the Catholic Workers group’s “semi-communistic ideology.” A third indicates the bureau’s interest in determining the location of a protest over llama fur planned by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.